Perspective Piece: On the Swampitude of “Disclosure” Fatigue...
This perspective piece arose from an announcement of a new research project by the Sol Foundation - an apparent study intending to better anticipate American’s public response to some sort of official disclosure of the existence? intentions? of UAP?… NHI?… presumably known well enough by someone? some institution? some committee or advisory panel? some contractor somewhere? to thereby better inform and/or advise Presidential and Congressional leadership? as to citizen reaction? and its particulars? surrounding the concept of ‘Disclosure’?
It’s all a little murky to me, so here’s that fundraising link:
https://thesolfoundation.org/fund-the-study/
I had a lot of hope in the Sol Foundation in the beginning, but now, it and some of the other institutional start-ups seem to have gotten lost in the fog of… developmental potentials.
Studies can be very helpful - don't get me wrong - but, how they are designed can make all the difference to their utility - which, itself, is complex. Studies are relative to conditions (current and past), so risk quickly expired relevance, as some amount to a mere snapshot in time - and can therefore additionally risk mischaracterization, reflecting confounded thinking of the day from which they emerged. They are of course authored and often sponsored - which should always invite scrutiny. They are typically generated relative to a time of pivotal influence driving public opinion (and private opportunity - itself tied to funding now and in future). In short, they can be fraught. Particularly politically.
UAP/NHI Disclosure is no different. Even the acronym "UAP" (unidentified anomalous phenomena) reflects a modernized reference to UFO (unidentified flying object) - as an intel re-branding (albeit a good re-brand, as it more aptly reflects the truer nature of the aka 'phenomena'). "NHI" is more misleading. 'Non-Human Intelligence'(s) literally proliferate across our diverse biosphere.
All of this… just further nuance periodically sprinkled throughout our reality by those with the potential incentive to mischaracterize it. But, of course, some well-designed and conducted studies can be highly useful, even as snapshots in time - and this may be one of them. I’m not likely to read it should it come to fruition, as my own frame of reference as a free-willed, social animal still somewhat enabled by Constitutional capacities is reasonably without interference. Empirical. Vetted. Carefully, carefully scrutinized - and that includes efforts at determining the general vibe of an international landscape as I share what I've discovered on my own.
Again I say, let the intel community have their thing. They will conclude and publish their own conclusions against a fluid landscape of not-so-discreet years-on manipulation. I'm not challenging that sub-reality. Not many are challenging it. But I don't think it’s fooling many... Disclosure is done. It happened a very long time ago, and is still occurring - for real... from source, not substitute. Call me cautious, but not deluded.
Everything has a process and a path forward. We are figuring out genuine totality together.
Around the world, ancient depictions of entities, events, environs etched and painted on rockfaces may be reflective of everything from dream world to lucid visions, physical to metaphysical manifestations, reverent ceremonial communal, deity, event or other sacred commemorations… to whacked-out altered-state doodleotomies or halucination… also maps and locations, food and water sources, migration paths, accounting systems, and demarcations of other daily affairs. Pretty much everything modern society has ever produced was very likely also produced then. Some of it - just like throughout all of human history - extraordinarily sacred and revered. Other… just an interesting observation, a ‘weird - what if this were real?’… or ‘hey man, i was here’... Humans making meaning… making noise… making real and permanent what feels fleeting.
The world has known about NHI and UAP for eons - overwhelming evidence... carved in stone, pressed into clay, sprayed and painted on cave walls, stitched and inked onto hides and ancient parchment, woven into tapestry, and spoken of among tribes, clans, community gatherings and communal conversations in darkened pubs among farmers fresh from northern European fields.
World influencers be they spiritual/philosophical/religious, academic, political, commercial, scholarly - have known for eons. Modern experiencers and global contact events reveal as much as anything.
So, despite the delusion that it is so, it’s unlikely that anyone is crouching in a corner, barricading themselves with cans of corn while clutching a shovel against the boogeyed unknown.
The world has become too jaded and far too savvy to believe that 'Disclosure' with a capital D Depends upon any altruistic inclination and official Declaration of the United States government.
"Disclosure" in whatever form such insiders decide is appropriate to their purposes will be what it will be; but given the long history of US deception against even its own people - particularly on this topic - it's unlikely it will be believed in whole - but maybe in part.
Human physiology and psychology have not changed all that much since our founding. We’ve devised and become dependent on a lot of complicated, implosive, derisive and failing technologies… but fundamentally, the reason we’ve known for eons about a wider realm of reality than currently revealed by those laboring to deceive is because we are still complex spiritual beings of light, integrated within a phenomenally complex system of co-existence continuing to call to us beyond the static boundaries of any scientific study or proffered path of ease often designed to curtail insightful discovery.
So what is Disclosure even? What is it really? Who even knows what IS, or where it will lead?
Along those lines… here are a few thoughts offered by
Ross Coulthart as he explores Disclosure with investor Matthew Tuttle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnhaNY97tMo who offers what I would consider a broadly comprehensive approach to broad investment analysis, generally - let alone as it applies to looming “Disclosure”.
Whatever Disclosure ends up being, by whatever means it is revealed, by whatever means it is leveraged… call me also, hopeful.
(C) Text 2026 Lisa Bracken
Copyright notice: Images used under licensed agreement